LARS MOLLER /AFP DENMARK: Danes gathered in Copenhagen to appeal for peaceful dialogue to resolve the conflict over the publication of cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.

What's Inside Letters to the Editor The high school dropout population The dangers of regulating speech Port deal is safe and critical to America's foreign policy Controversial Gitmo is different now More Insight

MORE ANGST
Why I published those cartoons

Three views of cartoon controversy that shook the world

By Flemming Rose

Childish. Irresponsible. Hate speech. A provocation just for the sake of provocation. A PR stunt. Critics of 12 cartoons of the prophet Muhammad published in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten have not minced their words. They say that freedom of expression does not imply an endorsement of insulting people's religious feelings, and besides, they add, the media censor themselves every day. So, please do not teach us a lesson about limitless freedom of speech.

By Omar Hassaine

The publication of cartoons by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten that were insulting to Muslims worldwide triggered some of the largest demonstrations, as well as debates, around the world. Unfortunately, some individuals, groups, and commentators from both sides have exploited this opportunity to further their own agendas and preconceived beliefs, prolonging the controversy.

By Kenneth Jacobson

Rarely has an incident highlighted the gaping chasm between two worlds more than the Danish cartoon controversy. In the West, the controversy points to the need for continuing discussion and consideration as to how to maintain freedom of the press while being sensitive to ethnic and religious minorities.

In rejecting the second draft of City Golf Manager Mark Woodward's five-year plan for city-owned courses, the Golf Advisory Council acted wisely. Especially when it comes to the beloved Torrey Pines golf complex, we need a much-revised third draft that does a better job of balancing the public's interest with the often-allied interests of city officials, resorts and brokers who sell tee times.

How is it that top executives at a top public institution of higher learning did not learn from a pay scandal 13 years ago to avoid another one? Responding to outrage about pay in 1993, the Board of Regents of the University of California established rules to limit some compensation for senior UC officials and to ensure the disclosure – and the defensibility – of their full compensation.

The imbroglio over allowing a firm owned by the United Arab Emirates to control terminals in six U.S. ports – in Miami, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, Newark and New York – has brought to light one of President Bush's shortcomings.