Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Home Today's Paper Sports Entertainment sdjobs sdhomes sdwheels Classifieds Shopping Visitors Guide Forums
 Thursday
 »Next Story»
 News
 Local News
 Opinion
 Business
 Sports
 Quest
 Night & Day
 Front Page (PDF)
 The Last Week
 Sunday
 Monday
 Tuesday
 Wednesday
 Thursday
 Friday
 Saturday
 Weekly Sections
 Books |  UT-Books
 Family
 Food
 Health
 Home
 Homescape
 Dialog
 InStyle
 Night & Day
 Sunday Arts
 Travel
 Quest
 Wheels
Subscribe to the UT
 Sponsored Links








The San Diego Union-Tribune

 
Accord reached in Lebanon could end political deadlock

'We avoided civil war,' leader of coalition says

NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

May 22, 2008

BEIRUT, Lebanon – An agreement reached early yesterday by Lebanese political factions amounts to a significant shift of power in favor of the militant Shiite group Hezbollah and its allies in the opposition, who won the power to veto any Cabinet decision, officials said yesterday.

The deal to form a new government promised an end to 18 months of crippling political deadlock and underscored the rising power of Iran and Syria, which have backed Hezbollah in a proxy battle against the governing coalition and its U.S. and Saudi allies.

Government leaders said they had given way on major provisions because they felt the alternative was war. They said they won a pledge that no faction would use its weapons against other Lebanese, as Hezbollah and its allies did during street battles this month in the worst internal fighting since Lebanon's 15-year civil war.

“We avoided civil war,” said Walid Jumblatt, a leader of the governing coalition. He said the agreement called for a future dialogue on weapons, a clause he and other government leaders hoped would eventually allow them to raise the controversial issue of Hezbollah's arsenal.

The agreement was brokered by Arab mediators in Doha, Qatar, and involved intensive, last-minute diplomacy among all the major regional players in Lebanon, including Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Before the agreement, an Iranian adviser assured Saudi officials that Iran did not want a confrontation with Arab nations, an adviser to the Saudi government said. Iran agreed to use its influence to prevent Hezbollah from entering Sunni Muslim areas of Lebanon, the adviser said; such incursions occurred during clashes two weeks ago.

The agreement specifies a new government and a new election law, ending an 18-month opposition sit-in that had suffocated business in Beirut's downtown commercial center. It also calls for the election of the army chief, Gen. Michel Suleiman, as president. The post has been vacant since November.

But the deal leaves unresolved the questions that provoked the crisis in December 2006. Those include Hezbollah's weapons and Lebanon's relations with Syria, which ended its 29-year military presence in Lebanon in 2005 after the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

The divisive issue of cooperation with a U.N. tribunal to investigate Hariri's death and 10 other killings that followed remains to be solved. Pro-government officials accuse Syria of involvement in those assassinations.

The governing coalition hailed the pact as a fair compromise, as did officials in Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia and France.

The Bush administration portrayed the agreement as a good step. C. David Welch, the assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, said that despite Hezbollah's veto power over the Cabinet, the deal could make Syria's eventual return to Lebanon impossible.

 »Next Story»


 Sponsored Links


Advertisements from the print edition








© Copyright 2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site